Medical Policy |
Subject: Neuromuscular Electrical Training for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea or Snoring | |
Document #: DME.00043 | Publish Date: 10/01/2024 |
Status: Reviewed | Last Review Date: 08/08/2024 |
Description/Scope |
This document addresses the use of neuromuscular electrical training of the tongue muscles, or neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) as a treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or snoring. The eXciteOSA® (Signifier Medical Technologies, Needham, MA) is the first OSA treatment device to be used while awake and is intended to improve tongue function.
Position Statement |
Investigational and Not Medically Necessary:
The use of a neuromuscular electrical training device is considered investigational and not medically necessary for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea or snoring.
Rationale |
In February 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized marketing of the eXciteOSA device, formerly known as the Snoozeal device, as a treatment of snoring and mild OSA. The authorization was approved based on the Baptista study (2021). The device was reviewed through the De Novo premarket review pathway. The FDA identified this device as:
Neuromuscular tongue muscle stimulator for the reduction of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. A neuromuscular tongue muscle stimulator for the reduction of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea consists of a removable intraoral mouthpiece that uses electrodes to deliver neuromuscular stimulation to the tongue to strengthen tongue musculature to reduce snoring and obstructive sleep apnea.
During sleep, there is a reduction in muscle tone and increased collapsibility in the throat and tongue. Neuromuscular electrical training is proposed to treat OSA based on the premise that transcutaneous electrical stimulation can improve tone and function in dysfunctional skeletal muscles (Baptista, 2021). Myofunctional therapy uses isotonic and isometric exercises to improve the function of the upper airway dilator muscles in the mouth, pharynx and upper respiratory tract. It has been investigated as a non-invasive, non-pharmacological technique to treat OSA. This therapy is meant to increase tone, tension, endurance and mobility of the oropharyngeal muscles and soft tissues that collapse during apnea episodes (Rueda, 2020). In a systematic review of nine randomized, controlled trials (RCTs), Reuda (2020) found no objective evidence that myofunctional therapy improves OSA. Compared to CPAP therapy, myofunctional therapy showed little to no difference in daytime sleepiness and a possible increase in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). While the review did not include any studies which used neuromuscular electrical training devices, the results did not show that treatment focusing on toning and strengthening the oropharyngeal muscles improved clinical outcomes.
In an industry sponsored pilot study, Wessolleck and colleagues (2018) evaluated whether electrical stimulation of the intraoral musculature, using an intraoral stimulation training device (eXciteOSA), decreases snoring in those without OSA or with mild OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] < 15). Snoring intensity before, during, and 2 weeks post-treatment was reported by bed partners who documented the intensity according to a visual analog scale (VAS). While 16 participants were initially included, only 13 participants completed the study. The participants’ bed partners reported a significantly reduced snoring intensity from baseline up to 2 weeks following treatment. While the participants underwent sleep testing prior to participation to check for the presence of OSA and the level of severity based on AHI, there was no further testing of AHI following treatment. No conclusions can be drawn regarding the treatment of clinically significant OSA based on this small, short-term case series which focused on subjectively-reported snoring intensity.
An industry sponsored, multicenter, prospective study by Baptista and colleagues (2021) evaluated the use of daytime neuromuscular electrical training (NMES) of tongue muscles to treat primary snoring with mild sleep apnea. All participants had documented snoring (n=125). A segment of this population also had a mild OSA diagnosis (n=48). Prior to inclusion in the study, individuals underwent a screening sleep test to confirm an AHI < 15. In addition, participants needed to have a consistent daily bed partner to report snoring intensity using VAS. Participants used the device for 6 weeks, then discontinued use for 2 weeks before reassessment using a home sleep study. The partner began reporting 2 weeks prior to the 6-week treatment phase and continued until 2 weeks following the treatment phase. The change in the proportion of time snoring at levels > 40dB, the primary endpoint, showed a mean reduction of 41% at the second sleep study. Approximately 90% of participants demonstrated some level of reduction in their objective snoring time. While the mean improvement in AHI from 6.85 to 5.03 was statistically significant, the improvement was not clinically significant. Subjective measures, such as partner reported VAS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), were improved from baseline compared to the end of the study results. While this study incorporated objective outcome measurements, this small study was limited by the lack of a comparison group and short-term follow-up. Additionally, the study was not adequately powered to detect a 20% reduction in snoring time with 80% power.
In another industry sponsored prospective cohort study, Kotecha and associates (2021) evaluated the usefulness of an intraoral neuromuscular stimulation device in treating individuals with primary snoring or mild OSA. Several features of both conditions were assessed, including the percentage of time snoring, different loudness levels, AHI, oxygen desaturation index (ODI), and oxygen saturations. Sleep studies were performed before and following the 6-week treatment period. A total of 75 participants were included and 70 completed the trial; 32 of those who completed the trial had a diagnosis of snoring and 38 had mild OSA. The group with a primary diagnosis of snoring reported an average 41% reduction in all snoring above 40dB. In participants with mild OSA, the AHI and ODI posttreatment levels were reduced compared to pretreatment levels: 9.8 compared to 4.7 events/hour (52% reduction) and 7.8 compared to 4.3 events/hour (45% reduction), respectively. As in earlier studies, the results are limited by its small size, lack of a control group and the short follow-up period.
A sham RCT published by Poncin in 2022 assessed the effectiveness of a tongue elevation muscle training program in reducing OSA severity. Individuals with moderate OSA and a history of low adherence to CPAP therapy (mean use of less than 4 hours per night) were randomized to 6 weeks of a tongue muscle training protocol group (n=14) or a sham protocol control group (n=13). The tongue muscle training group exercised for approximately 15-minutes. The sham control group’s intervention was to exhale 10 times into a positive expiratory pressure device for 3 consecutive sets. Both groups performed their assigned intervention for 4 sessions per week for 6 weeks. At the end of 6 weeks, there was no difference in the primary outcome, the AHI, in either group. The authors concluded that the 6-week tongue elevation strength and endurance training program had no effect on OSA severity.
Abreu and colleagues (2023) published the results of a RCT which evaluated adherence to daytime NMES using the eXciteOSA device in individuals with mild OSA. A total of 40 participants were randomized to high (active) or low (sham) intensity for the 6-week trial. The researchers reported improved respiratory event index (REI) in the active group. However, the study was designed to evaluate adherence, not efficacy. Like all previous studies, the study focused on very short-term outcomes.
Other evidence regarding neuromuscular electrical training devices consist of a few short-term studies with a limited number of participants report no improvements in net health outcomes. The lack of clinical benefit is particularly evident in the treatment of OSA (Chwieśko-Minarowska, 2016; Randerath, 2004). No medical societies address the use of a neuromuscular electrical training device in the treatment of OSA.
Background/Overview |
Both OSA and snoring are considered types of sleep disordered breathing disorders. OSA affects approximately 2 to 9% of individuals in the United States, with 60% categorized as mild OSA. Habitual snoring can indicate a susceptibility to and a precursor for OSA. The treatment of snoring and mild OSA is considered controversial (Baptista, 2021).
The eXciteOSA device is a removable neuromuscular stimulation device which delivers stimulation to the tongue. The use of the device once a day is intended to improve tongue muscle function and, over time, theorized to prevent the tongue from collapsing backwards and obstructing the airway during sleep. Once the mouthpiece is inserted into the mouth, 4 electrodes located above and below the tongue deliver consecutive electrical muscle stimulation sessions with rest periods in between. A smartphone application controls therapy intensity and monitors usage. The device is intended to be used once a day for 20 minutes for 6 weeks then decreasing to once a week after the initial active treatment phase. The device is not intended to be used in individuals with OSA and an AHI of 15 and higher.
Definitions |
Apnea: A period in which breathing ceases.
Apnea-Hypopnea index (AHI): A measure of apnea severity defined by the total number of episodes of apnea or hypopnea during a full period of sleep divided by the number of hours asleep.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): This is a form of sleep disturbance, which occurs as the result of a physical occlusion of the upper airway during sleep, which interferes with normal breathing. The occlusion is usually in the back of the tongue and/or flabby tissue in the upper airway. This condition is associated with frequent awakening and often with daytime sleepiness.
According to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM), updated definitions of OSA severity are provided as follows:
Coding |
The following codes for treatments and procedures applicable to this document are included below for informational purposes. Inclusion or exclusion of a procedure, diagnosis or device code(s) does not constitute or imply member coverage or provider reimbursement policy. Please refer to the member's contract benefits in effect at the time of service to determine coverage or non-coverage of these services as it applies to an individual member.
When services are Investigational and Not Medically Necessary:
For the following procedure codes, or when the code describes a procedure indicated in the Position Statement section as investigational and not medically necessary.
HCPCS |
|
E0490 | Power source and control electronics unit for oral device/appliance for neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the tongue muscle, controlled by hardware remote |
E0491 | Oral device/appliance for neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the tongue muscle, used in conjunction with the power source and control electronics unit, controlled by hardware remote, 90-day supply |
E0492 | Power source and control electronics unit for oral device/appliance for neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the tongue muscle, controlled by phone application |
E0493 | Oral device/appliance for neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the tongue muscle, used in conjunction with the power source and control electronics unit, controlled by phone application, 90-day supply |
|
|
ICD-10 Diagnosis |
|
| All diagnoses, including but not limited to |
G47.00-G47.9 | Sleep disorders |
R06.83 | Snoring |
References |
Peer Reviewed Publications:
Government Agency, Medical Society, and Other Authoritative Publications:
Websites for Additional Information |
Index |
Daytime Neuromuscular Therapy
eXciteOSA
Neuromuscular Electrical Training
Snoozeal
Transoral NMES
Transoral Neuromuscular Electrical Training
The use of specific product names is illustrative only. It is not intended to be a recommendation of one product over another, and is not intended to represent a complete listing of all products available.
Document History |
Status | Date | Action |
Reviewed | 08/08/2024 | Medical Policy & Technology Assessment Committee (MPTAC) review. Updated Description, Rationale and References sections. |
| 12/28/2023 | Updated Coding section with 01/01/2024 HCPCS changes, added E0492, E0493 replacing K1028, K1029 deleted as of 01/01/2024. |
Reviewed | 08/10/2023 | MPTAC review. Updated Rationale, References and Index sections. Updated Coding section with 10/01/2023 HCPCS changes; added E0490 and E0491, revised descriptor for K1028. |
Reviewed | 08/11/2022 | MPTAC review. Updated Rationale, References and Websites sections. Updated Coding section to correct ICD-10-CM code to G47.00. |
| 04/01/2022 | Updated Coding section with 04/01/2022 HCPCS changes; added K1028, K1029 replacing NOC code E1399. |
New | 08/12/2021 | MPTAC review. Initial document development. |
Federal and State law, as well as contract language, including definitions and specific contract provisions/exclusions, take precedence over Medical Policy and must be considered first in determining eligibility for coverage. The member’s contract benefits in effect on the date that services are rendered must be used. Medical Policy, which addresses medical efficacy, should be considered before utilizing medical opinion in adjudication. Medical technology is constantly evolving, and we reserve the right to review and update Medical Policy periodically.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without permission from the health plan.
© CPT Only - American Medical Association