Clinical UM Guideline |
Subject: Red Blood Cell Folic Acid Testing | |
Guideline #: CG-LAB-15 | Publish Date: 01/03/2024 |
Status: Reviewed | Last Review Date: 11/09/2023 |
Description |
This document addresses the use of red blood cell (RBC) folic acid laboratory testing, also known as RBC folate. RBC folic acid measures the level of vitamin B9, folate. RBC folic acid no longer meets the standard of care in evaluating an individual’s folate levels because serum folate is a more accurate and reliable measurement of folate levels.
Clinical Indications |
Not Medically Necessary:
RBC folic acid testing is considered not medically necessary in all cases.
Coding |
The following codes for treatments and procedures applicable to this guideline are included below for informational purposes. Inclusion or exclusion of a procedure, diagnosis or device code(s) does not constitute or imply member coverage or provider reimbursement policy. Please refer to the member's contract benefits in effect at the time of service to determine coverage or non-coverage of these services as it applies to an individual member.
When services are Not Medically Necessary:
CPT |
|
82747 | Folic acid; RBC |
|
|
ICD-10 Diagnosis |
|
| All diagnoses |
Discussion/General Information |
Vitamin B9 exists in several forms, naturally as various forms of folate or in a synthetic form as folic acid. Folate is a water-soluble vitamin found in a variety of foods including green, leafy vegetables, fruits, cereals and grains, nuts, and meats. Deficiencies are linked to neural tube defects in infants and megaloblastic anemia and increased concentrations of homocysteine (Joelson, 2007). Humans are unable to synthesize folate and depend on dietary sources of folate or folic acid. Folate deficiency is very sensitive to dietary intake and responds well to treatment (Aslinia, 2006). Since the United States mandated fortification of processed grains with folic acid in 1998, the rate of folate deficiency has become a “rare event” (Joelson, 2007). The prevalence of very low or deficient serum folate levels, defined as < 3 µg/L (< 7 nM), prior to the fortification program was as high as 18.3% (De Bruyn, 2014). Following mandated fortification, deficit rates fell to 0.056% to 0.2% (Ashraf, 2008; De Bruyn, 2014; Theisen-Toupal, 2014).
In the past, microbiological assays were used to measure folate status in clinical settings. Competitive folate protein binding assays have largely replaced the microbiological assays as they are less expensive and easier to use. However, assays for measuring RBC folate levels have been unreliable and results vary widely based on the test used (Aslinia, 2006; Shane, 2011). The assays to measure folate levels are competitive protein binding assays using a folate binding protein such as β-lactoglobulin (Gilfix, 2014). These assays have limitations because various forms of folate bind with the folate binding proteins with varying affinities. This results in lower concentrations being reported compared to results obtained from microbiological assays. The interpretation of these results against the recognized ranges and cutoffs is problematic, as the guidelines addressing folate status adequacy ranges and cutoffs were developed using microbiological assays with L. casei (Gilfix, 2014; Shane, 2011). Approximately 95% of folate is located within RBCs. While RBC folate should theoretically be more stable and less susceptible to rapid changes in dietary intake, these assays have large imprecisions that limit their usefulness (Gilfix, 2014). Low RBC folate levels have been documented in several conditions including alcohol use, pregnancy, vitamin B12 deficiency and in anticonvulsant medication usage (Aslinia, 2006).
De Bruyn and associates (2014) examined the relationships between serum/RBC folate with other parameters (for example vitamin B12 and homocysteine). The authors also examined the use of RBC folate to detect folate deficiency. The overall goal of the study was to determine the most appropriate method to diagnose folate deficiency, determine specific abnormal serum folate concentration levels and whether serum folate is an accurate measure of folate body stores. Retrospective samples for serum folate (n=63,113) and RBC folate (n=18,115) were analyzed as well as serum vitamin B12, homocysteine and RBC values (count, hematocrit, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration) when available. There was a positive correlation between serum and RBC folate, showing that the use of both tests is redundant. The authors list the drawbacks of RBC folate testing noting:
Assays for RBC folate are far from standardized and include manual sample pretreatments, implying possible sources of errors: incomplete hemolysis, suboptimal hydrolysis of folylpolyglutamate, binding of folate to hemoglobin, folate degradation, hemoglobin denaturation or folate trapping in the case of vitamin B12 deficiencies.
Multiple studies have reported that RBC folate levels do not provide any additional relevant information over that provided by serum folate levels (Farrell, 2013; Galloway, 2003; Gilfix, 2014).
Definitions |
Red Blood Cell Folic Acid: Laboratory measurement that reflects folate body stores and turnover during the preceding 3-4 months. Low RBC values are a later indication of low or declining folate levels in the body.
Serum Folate: Laboratory measurement that reflects current folate intake/balance. Low serum folate values are an early indication of low or declining folate levels in the body.
References |
Peer Reviewed Publications:
Government Agency, Medical Society, and Other Authoritative Publications:
Websites for Additional Information |
History |
Status | Date | Action |
Reviewed | 11/09/2023 | Medical Policy & Technology Assessment Committee (MPTAC) review. Updated Description, Discussion and References section. |
Reviewed | 11/10/2022 | MPTAC review. Updated References section. |
Reviewed | 11/11/2021 | MPTAC review. Updated Discussion and References section. |
New | 11/05/2020 | MPTAC review. Initial document development. |
Federal and State law, as well as contract language, and Medical Policy take precedence over Clinical UM Guidelines. We reserve the right to review and update Clinical UM Guidelines periodically. Clinical guidelines approved by the Medical Policy & Technology Assessment Committee are available for general adoption by plans or lines of business for consistent review of the medical necessity of services related to the clinical guideline when the plan performs utilization review for the subject. Due to variances in utilization patterns, each plan may choose whether to adopt a particular Clinical UM Guideline. To determine if review is required for this Clinical UM Guideline, please contact the customer service number on the member's card.
Alternatively, commercial or FEP plans or lines of business which determine there is not a need to adopt the guideline to review services generally across all providers delivering services to Plan’s or line of business’s members may instead use the clinical guideline for provider education and/or to review the medical necessity of services for any provider who has been notified that his/her/its claims will be reviewed for medical necessity due to billing practices or claims that are not consistent with other providers, in terms of frequency or in some other manner.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without permission from the health plan.
© CPT Only - American Medical Association