Clinical UM Guideline |
Subject: Sacral Nerve Stimulation as a Treatment of Neurogenic Bladder Secondary to Spinal Cord Injury | |
Guideline #: CG-SURG-08 | Publish Date: 06/28/2024 |
Status: Reviewed | Last Review Date: 05/09/2024 |
Description |
This document addresses sacral nerve stimulation as a treatment of neurogenic bladder due to spinal cord injury. The device consists of extradural electrodes that are attached to the sacral anterior nerve roots, a subcutaneously implanted receiver-stimulator, and an external battery-powered controller and transmitter. The system is self-activated and provides low levels of electrical stimulation designed to produce functional contraction of the innervated muscles. Implantation is frequently performed in conjunction with a posterior rhizotomy to eliminate reflex incontinence.
Note: Please see the following related documents for additional information:
Clinical Indications |
Medically Necessary:
Self-activated electrical stimulation of intact anterior sacral nerve roots using an implantable device (for example, Vocare Bladder System/FineTech Brindley Bladder Control System) to provide urination on demand and reduce post-void residual volume is considered medically necessary for individuals who meet all of the following criteria:
Not Medically Necessary:
Self-activated electrical stimulation of the anterior sacral roots is considered not medically necessary for all other indications.
*As defined by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale.
Coding |
The following codes for treatments and procedures applicable to this document are included below for informational purposes. Inclusion or exclusion of a procedure, diagnosis or device code(s) does not constitute or imply member coverage or provider reimbursement policy. Please refer to the member's contract benefits in effect at the time of service to determine coverage or non-coverage of these services as it applies to an individual member.
When services may be Medically Necessary when criteria are met for sacral root neurostimulators:
CPT |
|
63185 | Laminectomy with rhizotomy, 1 or 2 segments |
63190 | Laminectomy with rhizotomy; more than 2 segments |
63655 | Laminectomy for implantation of neurostimulator electrodes, plate/paddle, epidural [when specified as sacral root neurostimulator] |
|
|
HCPCS |
|
L8680 | Implantable neurostimulator electrode, each [when specified as sacral root neurostimulator] |
L8682 | Implantable neurostimulator radiofrequency receiver [when specified as sacral root neurostimulator] |
L8684 | Radiofrequency transmitter (external) for use with implantable sacral root neurostimulator receiver for bowel and bladder management, replacement |
|
|
ICD-10 Procedure |
|
018R0ZZ | Division of sacral nerve, open approach |
018R3ZZ | Division of sacral nerve, percutaneous approach |
018R4ZZ | Division of sacral nerve, percutaneous endoscopic approach |
00HU0MZ | Insertion of neurostimulator lead into spinal canal, open approach |
00HU3MZ | Insertion of neurostimulator lead into spinal canal, percutaneous approach |
00HU4MZ | Insertion of neurostimulator lead into spinal canal, percutaneous endoscopic approach |
00HV0MZ | Insertion of neurostimulator lead into spinal cord, open approach |
00HV3MZ | Insertion of neurostimulator lead into spinal cord, percutaneous approach |
00HV4MZ | Insertion of neurostimulator lead into spinal cord, percutaneous endoscopic approach |
|
|
ICD-10 Diagnosis |
|
| All diagnoses |
When services are Not Medically Necessary:
For the procedure codes listed above for sacral nerve root stimulators when criteria are not met and for all other indications.
Discussion/General Information |
Spinal cord injury (SCI) can result in varying degrees of neurological impairment depending on the location and severity of the injury. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale is a system used to classify or describe the extent of spinal cord injuries. The classification is as follows:
A = Complete: No motor and sensory function is preserved in the sacral segments S4-S5.
B = Incomplete: Sensory but not motor function is preserved below the neurological level and includes the sacral segments S4-S5.
C = Incomplete: Motor function is preserved below the neurological level, and more than half of key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade less than 3.
D = Incomplete: Motor function is preserved below the neurological level, and at least half of key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade of 3 or more.
E = Normal: Motor and sensory function are normal.
Supra-sacral spinal cord injury may result in neurogenic bladder, characterized in part by frequent urinary tract infections from inadequate bladder emptying. The high bladder pressures related to large post-void residuals can lead to autonomic dysreflexia, vesicoureteral reflux, upper urinary tract dilations, hydronephrosis, and eventual renal failure.
Sacral anterior root stimulation is intended to provide bladder evacuation by delivering electrical stimulation to intact spinal nerve roots in order to produce functional contraction of the innervated muscles. Implantation of a sacral anterior root stimulator is typically performed in conjunction with a simultaneous posterior rhizotomy. The rhizotomy results in an areflexive bladder with low intravesicular pressure and high compliance. When the user activates the implanted stimulator, the urethral sphincter and bladder contract and relax, allowing the bladder to empty on demand with low residual urine volumes.
The Vocare Bladder System (Finetech Medical, Hertfordshire, UK) has received approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for stimulation of the sacral anterior nerve root. Outside of the United States, the device is known as the Finetech-Brindley device. The FDA-labeled indication, approved in 1999, included the following:
The Neurocontrol Vocare Bladder System is indicated for the treatment of patients who have clinically complete spinal cord lesions with intact parasympathetic innervation of the bladder and are skeletally mature and neurologically stable, to provide urination on demand and to reduce post-void residual volumes of urine.
Intact parasympathetic innervation of the bladder is described by the manufacturer as having “intact reflex bladder contractions” (Finetech Medical, 2021). The Vocare package insert further specified:
Prior to implant, patients should show reflex bladder contraction with an increase in detrusor pressures over baseline of at least 35 cm H20 in women and 50 cm H20 in men during cystometry. This ensures that parasympathetic preganglionic neurons from the conus medullaris to the bladder are intact.
The Vocare Bladder System consists of the following implantable external and surgical components.
The Vocare Bladder System received FDA approval through a Humanitarian Device Exemption and as such, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were not required for approval. The FDA approval was based on the Creasey (2001) prospective trial. The study included 23 individuals with complete suprasacral spinal cord injuries who underwent implantation of the device in association with posterior rhizotomy and were followed for a minimum of 3 months. Comparisons were made with the device turned on and off; thus subjects served as their own controls. There was a significant improvement in bladder emptying, as measured by voided volumes and post void residual, when the device was turned on compared with the off condition. For example, at 3 months, 19 of 21 individuals (91%) for whom data were available voided more than 200 mL of urine on demand with the device turned on versus no participants voiding more than 200 mL of urine with the device turned off. Diary data at 12 months were available for 17 participants; of these, 12 reported a reduction in urinary incontinence.
Ren and colleagues (2015) performed a literature review of electrical nerve stimulation used for promotion of micturition in individuals with spinal cord injuries. There were no RCTs or other controlled trials found. The authors identified 14 uncontrolled studies using Brindley devices published between 1982 and 2013. Continence rates ranged from 59% to 93%. Review authors did not pool study findings. However, they concluded that “electrical nerve stimulation, mainly conducted with the Finetech-Brindley stimulator, is a considerable option for bladder management in SCI patients.” As noted above, the Finetech-Brindley device is branded as Vocare in the United States.
References |
Peer Reviewed Publications:
Government Agency, Medical Society, and Other Authoritative Publications:
Index |
FineTech-Brindley Bladder Control System
Neurogenic Bladder
Sacral Nerve Stimulation
Spinal Cord Injury
Vocare Bladder System
The use of specific product names is illustrative only. It is not intended to be a recommendation of one product over another, and is not intended to represent a complete listing of all products available.
History |
Status | Date | Action |
Reviewed | 05/09/2024 | Medical Policy & Technology Assessment Committee (MPTAC) review. References section updated. |
Reviewed | 05/11/2023 | MPTAC review. Description, Discussion/General Information and References sections updated. |
Reviewed | 05/12/2022 | MPTAC review. References section updated. |
Reviewed | 05/13/2021 | MPTAC review. Discussion/General Information and References sections updated. Reformatted Coding section. |
Reviewed | 05/14/2020 | MPTAC review. References sections updated. |
Reviewed | 06/06/2019 | MPTAC review. Discussion/General Information and References sections updated. |
Reviewed | 07/26/2018 | MPTAC review. The document header wording updated from “Current Effective Date” to “Publish Date.” Description, Discussion and Reference sections updated. |
Revised | 08/03/2017 | MPTAC review. In the Clinical Indication section, changed “(American Spinal Injury Association)” to “*”. Added “*As defined by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale” to the bottom of the Clinical Indication section. Updated Discussion and References sections. |
Reviewed | 08/04/2016 | MPTAC review. References and Websites updated. Removed ICD-9 codes from Coding section. Updated formatting in Clinical Indications section. |
Reviewed | 08/06/2015 | MPTAC review. Discussion and Reference sections updated. |
Reviewed | 08/14/2014 | MPTAC review. Description, Discussion and References sections updated. |
Reviewed | 08/08/2013 | MPTAC review. References section updated. |
Reviewed | 08/09/2012 | MPTAC review. Description and References sections updated. |
Reviewed | 08/18/2011 | MPTAC review. Coding, Discussion and References sections updated. |
Reviewed | 08/19/2010 | MPTAC review. Discussion, Coding and References links updated. |
Reviewed | 08/27/2009 | MPTAC review. Note below Description, Discussion and References updated. |
Reviewed | 08/28/2008 | MPTAC review. Medically Necessary statement and Not Medically Necessary statement clarified. No change to stance. Description, Discussion and References updated. |
Revised | 08/23/2007 | MPTAC review. Medically Necessary statement clarified. Added Not Medically Necessary statement. References and Coding updated. |
Reviewed | 09/14/2006 | MPTAC review. Updated References and Coding. |
| 11/22/2005 | Added reference for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) – National Coverage Determination (NCD). |
Revised | 09/22/2005 | MPTAC review. Revision based on Pre-merger Anthem and Pre-merger WellPoint Harmonization. |
Pre-Merger Organizations | Last Review Date | Guideline Number | Title |
Anthem, Inc. |
|
| No document |
Anthem BCBS | 07/08/2002 | Anthem SE Memo1118 | Stimulation of the Sacral Anterior Root Combined with Posterior Sacral Rhizotomy in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury |
WellPoint Health Networks, Inc. | 06/24/2004 | 2.08.10 | Sacral Nerve Stimulation as a Treatment of Neurogenic Bladder Secondary to Spinal Cord Injury |
Federal and State law, as well as contract language, and Medical Policy take precedence over Clinical UM Guidelines. We reserve the right to review and update Clinical UM Guidelines periodically. Clinical guidelines approved by the Medical Policy & Technology Assessment Committee are available for general adoption by plans or lines of business for consistent review of the medical necessity of services related to the clinical guideline when the plan performs utilization review for the subject. Due to variances in utilization patterns, each plan may choose whether to adopt a particular Clinical UM Guideline. To determine if review is required for this Clinical UM Guideline, please contact the customer service number on the member's card.
Alternatively, commercial or FEP plans or lines of business which determine there is not a need to adopt the guideline to review services generally across all providers delivering services to Plan’s or line of business’s members may instead use the clinical guideline for provider education and/or to review the medical necessity of services for any provider who has been notified that his/her/its claims will be reviewed for medical necessity due to billing practices or claims that are not consistent with other providers, in terms of frequency or in some other manner.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without permission from the health plan.
© CPT Only - American Medical Association