Medical Policy

This document addresses occipital nerve blocks (or blockade) and sphenopalatine ganglion nerve blocks as a treatment of headache syndromes. Occipital nerve block therapy involves injection of a local anesthetic with or without steroid around the greater and lesser occipital nerves located in the back of the head just above the neck. These occipital nerve block procedures have been studied for the treatment of various headache syndromes and occipital neuralgia. Sphenopalatine ganglion nerve blocks involve intranasal insertion of topical anesthetic to block the sphenopalatine ganglion.

Note: Occipital nerve blockade as a diagnostic method for the evaluation of headaches and occipital neuralgia is not included within the scope of this document.

Note: Please see the following related documents for additional information:

• SURG.00112 Implantation of Occipital, Supraorbital or Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation Devices (and Related Procedures)
• SURG.00096 Surgical and Ablative Treatments for Chronic Headaches

Investigational and Not Medically Necessary:

Occipital nerve block therapy is considered investigational and not medically necessary for the treatment of occipital neuralgia and headache syndromes including, but not limited to, chronic migraine, chronic daily headache, cervicogenic and cluster headache.

Sphenopalatine ganglion nerve block therapy is considered investigational and not medically necessary for all indications including, but not limited to, the treatment of migraine headaches and non -migraine headaches.

Occipital nerve blocks

Chronic Migraine Headache:

Several placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been published that evaluate greater occipital nerve blockade (GONB) for treatment of chronic migraine. In 2015, results of a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study were published by Inan and colleagues in which individuals with chronic migraine were randomly divided into two groups of 42. GONB was administered 4 times (once per week) with saline placebo in group A and with bupivacaine in group B. After 4 weeks of treatment, the blinding was removed in group A and GONB using bupivacaine was delivered to this placebo group, while group B continued to receive bupivacaine once per month. The primary endpoint was the difference in number of headache days, duration of headache, and pain scores. After 1 month of treatment, the number of headache days had decreased from 16.9 ± 5.7 to 13.2 ± 6.7 in group A (p=0.035) and from 18.1 ± 5.3 to 8.8 ± 4.8 in group B (p<0.001) (between group difference p=0.004). The number of hours with headache had decreased from 24.2 ± 13.7 to 21.2 ± 13.4 in group A (p=0.223) and from 25.9 ± 16.3 to 19.3 ± 11.5 in group B (p<0.001) (between group difference p=0.767). The visual analog scale (VAS) score decreased from 8.1 ± 0.9 to 6.7 ± 1.6 in group A (p=0.002) and from 8.4 ± 1.5 to 5.3 ± 2.1 in group B (p<0.001) and p=0.004 between groups. After blinding was removed (in months 2 and 3), group A exhibited similar results to group B in month 3. The authors concluded that, in this limited trial, GONB with bupivacaine was superior to placebo and was effective and safe for the treatment of chronic migraine. However, limitations were noted within this study, which compared GONB vs. saline placebo. Only 72 of the 84 subjects actually completed the study (n=33 placebo; n=39 bupivacaine). Although treatment with bupivacaine reduced the number of headache days per month, it did not reduce the duration of headaches, compared with placebo. This placebo-controlled study of GONB in chronic migraine had only a short duration of follow-up, which was limited to only 1 month of actual blinding and did not address the potential confounder of a placebo effect.

Another placebo-controlled RCT was published by Chowdury and colleagues in 2023. Participants met diagnostic criteria for chronic migraine (migraine at least 8 days per month during a 4-week baseline period). A total of 44 individuals were included in the trial, 22 per group. Participants received either a GONB injection with 2 ml of 2% lidocaine or a placebo injection of normal saline. Three injections were given, at weeks 1, 4 and 8. A total of 42 individuals completed the double-blind phase of the trial, analysis was done at 12 weeks (4 weeks after the final injection). The primary endpoint was the change in the mean number of headache days from weeks 0-4 to weeks 9-12. This change was -7.2 days (95% confidence interval [CI], -10.9 to -5.8) in the active treatment group compared with -3 days (95% CI, -6.7 to -2.4) in the placebo group. The difference between groups was -4.2 days which was statistically significant, p=0.018. Secondary outcomes also favored the active treatment group. For example, a significantly greater proportion of participants in the active treatment group (40.9%) than the placebo group (9.1%) had at least a 50% reduction in headache days at 9-12 weeks, p=0.024. No serious adverse events were reported. A total of 16 individuals in the active treatment group and 15 in the placebo group reported adverse events that were mostly mild and transient. The blinded comparison period in this study was 12 weeks; however, outcomes were assessed only in the 4 weeks since the last injection.

Dilli and colleagues (2015) conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled study of 63 subjects with chronic migraine where a single treatment of GONB was delivered to 33 individuals in the active treatment arm. Participants were randomized to receive either 2.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml (20 mg) methylprednisolone over the ipsilateral (unilateral headache) or bilateral (bilateral headache) occipital nerve (ON) or 2.75 ml normal saline plus 0.25 ml of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine (placebo arm). In the active and placebo groups respectively, the mean frequency of at least moderate (mean 9.8 versus 9.5) and severe (3.6 versus 4.3) migraine days and acute medication days (7.9 versus 10.0) were not substantially different at baseline. All study subjects completed a 1-month headache diary prior to and after the double-blind injection. The primary outcome measure was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in the frequency of days with moderate or severe migraine headache in the 4-week post-injection study period, compared to the 4-week pre-injection baseline period. At 28 days post-injection, the percentage of participants with at least a 50% reduction in the frequency of moderate or severe headache days was 30% for both groups (10/30 vs. 9/30, 0.00, 95% CI, -0.22 to 0.23). The authors concluded that GONB does not reduce the frequency of moderate to severe migraine days in individuals with episodic or chronic migraine compared to placebo. However, this study did not evaluate the onset or duration of benefit of the GONB; it also did not evaluate the acute response to the injection. Not all trial participants were experiencing headache pain at the time of injection. The authors acknowledged the need for a placebo-controlled trial to evaluate GONB for acute relief of migraine pain.

Ashkenazi and colleagues (2008) conducted an RCT to determine whether adding triamcinolone to local anesthetics increased the efficacy of GONB and trigger-point injections (TPIs) for chronic daily headache (transformed migraine [TM]). The study included 37 participants who met criteria for TM and were randomized to receive GONB and TPIs using lidocaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5% with either saline (group A) or triamcinolone 40 mg (group B). The severity of headache and associated symptoms were assessed before and 20 minutes after injection. Participants documented headache and severity of associated symptoms for 4 weeks after injections. Changes in symptom severity were then compared between the two groups. Twenty minutes after injection, the mean headache severity had decreased by 3.2 points in group A (p<0.01) and by 3.1 points in group B (p<0.01) with a mean neck pain severity decrease by 1.5 points in group A (p<0.01) and 1.7 points in group B (p<0.01). The mean duration of headache-freedom was reported as 2.7 ± 3.8 days in group A and 1.0 ± 1.1 days in group B (p=0.67). None of the outcome measures differed significantly between the two groups. The authors concluded that the addition of triamcinolone to local anesthetics when performing GONB and TPIs was not associated with improved outcome.

A 2022 RCT by Chowdhury and colleagues evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of chronic migraine treatment with GONB combined with topiramate compared to monotherapy with topiramate. Participants were assigned to one of three treatment arms:

• Group A received topiramate monotherapy once per day
• Group B received topiramate plus GONB with 40 mg lidocaine (2%) and 80 mg (2 ml) methylprednisolone as a first injection followed by 2 monthly injections of lidocaine
• Group C participants received topiramate plus monthly GONB with 40 mg lidocaine (2%) injections for 3 months

There were 125 randomized participants; 41 in group A, 44 in group B, and 40 in group C. All participants met ICHD-3 criteria for chronic migraine. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in monthly migraine days. A secondary endpoint was the number of participants who achieved more than 50% reduction in monthly headache days from baseline to 3 months. Efficacy assessments were done for 121 participants. The following results were reported:

According to these results, participants who received combination therapy and GONB in groups B and C showed greater reductions in monthly migraine days at month 3 compared to those in group A who received topiramate only. None of the 44 participants in the topiramate-only group were lost to follow-up, whereas 5 of 44 (11%) participants in Group B and 3 of 40 (7.5%) participants in Group C left the study without stating a reason. The authors reported some mild treatment-emergent adverse events including limb paresthesias, local site swelling, bleeding, and dizziness. No serious adverse events were reported. In this study, lack of blinding and the lack of a placebo arm (sham injections) created risks for bias. The authors explained their choice not to include a placebo arm by saying they did this “because we were interested to know the effect of combination treatment versus monotherapy and not the efficacy of GONB in CM per se.”

A meta-analysis of studies evaluating GONB for chronic migraine was published by Velásquez-Rimachi and colleagues in 2022. Review eligibility criteria included control studies evaluating GONB with local anesthetics alone or combined with corticosteroids compared to placebo in adults with chronic migraine. The meta-analysis identified seven eligible RCTs, four of which were included in a quantitative synthesis. In a pooled analysis of three studies (total n=139) reporting headache intensity using a 10-point VAS scale, in the first month, GONB had a statistically significant benefit compared with placebo (mean difference [MD], -1.29; 95% CI, -1.95 to -0.64; p<0.05). The clinical significance of a 1.29 point difference on a 10-point scale is unclear. The authors concluded that “GONB with local anaesthetics might reduce headache frequency and intensity compared with placebo, whereas GONB with local anaesthetics plus corticosteroids did not show any additional benefit”. They stated that they had very low confidence in this conclusion because the available evidence consisted of only seven RCTs and these were of small size and were judged to have significant risks of bias. There were not enough studies identified to conduct meaningful pooled analysis of longer-term follow-up or a separate analysis of studies evaluating local anesthetics alone in the absence of corticosteroids.

Cluster Headache:

The evidence of benefit of GONB in the management of cluster headache is limited to case series showing only temporary symptomatic relief. Results of these case series varied in terms of frequency, intensity and duration of headache relief. Further study is needed to confirm the results of these observational studies (Gantenbein, 2012; Peres, 2002).

In 2023, the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) published guidelines on the treatment of cluster headache. The guideline included a statement on GONB. It was a consensus statement, which was issued because the group determined that the published evidence was insufficient to issue an evidence-based guideline. The document states: “Pharmacological nerve block of the GON is recommended and can be repeated if efficacious.”

Cervicogenic Headache:

A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of nerve stimulator-guided occipital nerve block (ONB) therapy in the treatment of cervicogenic headache. The reduction in analgesic consumption was the primary outcome measure. Fifty adult subjects diagnosed with cervicogenic headache were randomly divided into two equal groups of 25 each. All trial participants in both groups received greater and lesser ONB, whereas only 16 subjects in each group received facial nerve blockade in association with the occipital blocks. The control group received injections of an equivalent volume of preservative-free normal saline. Pain was assessed using the VAS and the Total Pain Index. A total of 47 subjects entered into the final analysis because 3 subjects were lost to follow-up. Anesthetic ONB was effective in reducing the VAS and the Total Pain Index by approximately 50% from baseline values (p=0.0001). Analgesic consumption; duration and frequency of headache; nausea; vomiting; photophobia; phonophobia; decreased appetite; and limitations in functional activities were significantly less in the treated block group compared to the control group (p<0.05). It was noted that the nerve stimulator technique for nerve localization enabled the operator to determine the exact location of the nerve, thereby increasing the chance for success. However, while use of the nerve stimulator technique improved the accuracy of ONB, it required the individual’s co-operation for optimal detection of the nerve. For this reason, effectiveness might not always be initially achieved, making repeated blocks necessary to increase the likelihood of success. Limitations of this study included the short duration of outcomes data with follow-up of only 2 weeks and difficulty in blinding due to numbness which was experienced by the treated study group who received the anesthetic blockade (Naja, 2006).

Despite preliminary results from limited trials demonstrating some efficacy for use of GONB in chronic headache syndromes, a review about cervicogenic headaches noted, “Because of the risks associated with these procedures (GONB) and the lack of well-controlled outcomes studies, more conservative interventions are typically prescribed” (Page, 2011).

Occipital Neuralgia:

According to the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), occipital neuralgia is a distinct headache syndrome classified as primary or secondary in etiology. Secondary headaches are usually associated with an underlying disease that may include tumor, trauma, infection, systemic disease or hemorrhage. Structural and neurologic abnormalities, as well as chronic neck tension and nerve pinching from overly tight neck muscles and nerve compression due to osteoarthritis or lesion, are all known causes of occipital neuralgia. In some cases, no cause can be isolated. Accurate diagnosis and treatment of the underlying condition often eliminates the headache. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) imaging are often used to diagnose occipital neuralgia following abnormal findings on a neurological examination. A positive response (that is, relief of pain) to an anesthetic nerve block can confirm the diagnosis.

The AANS has stated:

Treatment of occipital neuralgia aims to alleviate the pain; however, it is not a cure. Interventions can be surgical or non-surgical…Percutaneous nerve blocks: these injections can be used both to diagnose and treat occipital neuralgia. (AANS, 2024).

Regarding the efficacy of GONB therapy for the treatment of occipital neuralgia, efficacy has only been demonstrated in observational and cohort studies and series of small numbers with only short-term outcomes data. Given that there is no conclusive evidence of the durable therapeutic effect of GONB in occipital neuralgia, further study is needed to confirm its benefits when closely balanced with risk, before widespread use can be recommended (Bogduk, 2009; Hammond, 1978; Vanelderen, 2010).

Sphenopalatine Ganglion Blocks

Chronic Migraine

Sphenopalatine ganglion blocks (SPG) have also been proposed for treatment of headaches. In a double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled randomized study (Cady, 2015a), the authors reported the results of repetitive SPG block with anesthetic as a treatment for chronic migraine compared to saline. There were 41 participants initially randomized 2:1 to receive either an anesthetic agent (n=27) or saline (n=14). In the saline group, 1 participant withdrew from the study citing lack of efficacy. With 40 participants completing the treatment, efficacy was measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and, at two of the visits, by using a Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) questionnaire. There were 2 participants in the saline group and 1 participant in the SPG block group removed from data analysis due to protocol violations. The NRS score was assessed at baseline and at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 24 hours after treatment. Participants in the active treatment group received 12 SPG blocks while those in the sham group received saline twice per week for 6 weeks. Participants were-re-evaluated at 1 and 6 months after their final treatment. For those in the active treatment group, the pre-treatment NRS mean score was 3.18, 2.53 after 15 minutes, 2.41 after 30 minutes, and 2.85 after 24 hours. For the sham group, pre-treatment NRS mean score was 3.78, 3.51 after 15 minutes, 3.45 after 30 minutes, and 4.20 after 24 hours. HIT-6 scores were decreased in those receiving active treatment from before treatment to the final treatment compared to the sham group. Adverse events were reported as mild to moderate and included lacrimation, unpleasant taste and mouth numbness. These adverse events may suggest that blinding was not maintained for all participants. The primary end point was not statistically different when comparison was made between those who experienced adverse events and those who did not. There were no controls for use of abortive therapies prior to the study intervention. The authors characterized the study as “exploratory” in nature and noted that “Further research on the efficacy, optimal frequency, and numbers of repetitive SPG blockade is warranted.”

Using the same population as the Cady, 2015a study above, Cady and colleagues (Cady, 2015b) reported on sustained post-treatment outcomes (6-month outcomes) for secondary end points. Participants were assessed for change in the number of headache days from baseline to 1 month post treatment. Comparisons were also made for average pain, general activity, mood, normal work interference, and HIT-6 scores at 6 months post treatment. While some improvements were reported, there were no statistically significant differences in secondary end points between the treatment group and the sham group. The authors note “a more complete study of this novel treatment modality is warranted, as well as more studies to determine the role of the SPG in the physiology in migraine and its treatment.”

A 2022 Systematic Review and Practice Guideline for Percutaneous Interventional Strategies for Migraine Prevention published by the American Academy of Pain Medicine (Barad, 2022) gave a weak recommendation for SPG blocks use as chronic migraine prevention due to a very low certainty of evidence.

Post-Dural Puncture Headache

In 2020, Jespersen and colleagues reported on a study of the use of SPG treatment for post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). In this blinded, randomized clinical trial, 40 participants with post-dural puncture headache received either SPG block with local anesthetic (n=20) or saline (n=20). Primary outcome was measured using a 100 mm VAS score assessed at 30 minutes after SPG block. Secondary outcomes included: a) intensity of pain in the upright position at 1 hour and 7 days after SPG block; b) intensity of pain in the supine position at 30 minutes, 60 minutes and 7 days after SPG block; c) frequency of participants with a pain intensity less than 30 mm in the upright position at 30 min after SPG block; and d) the frequency of participants who received rescue SPG block or epidural blood patch. Pain intensity in the upright position 30 min after the block was 26 mm in the local anesthetic group versus 37 mm in the saline group. There were no significant differences in pain intensity at 60 min and 1 week after the block. The frequency of participants with pain intensity less than 30 mm at 30 min after SPG block was 12/20 (60%) in the local anesthetic group and 9/20 (45%) in the placebo group. In the local anesthetic group, during the time frame from 1 hour to 7 days after the block, 13/20 participants (65%) received a rescue block, and 10/20 (50%) received an epidural blood patch. In the placebo group, during the time frame from 1 hour to 7 days after the block, 13/20 (65%) received a rescue block and 9/20 (45%) received and epidural blood patch. Reported adverse events (by 10 participants) included severe nasal discomfort and nausea during treatment, light pain or discomfort during treatment, throat discomfort, ear pain, and tingling in the cheek. There were no statistically significant differences in pain intensity between the two groups. Noting a more than 40 mm VAS reduction of pain in both the active therapy and placebo groups, the authors proposed that the treatment effect may not have been related to the local anesthesia injection.

In 2021, the American Society of Anesthesiologists published their statement on Post-Dural Puncture Headache stating “There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend the use of acupuncture, greater occipital nerve blocks, sphenopalatine ganglion blocks, epidural morphine, and prophylactic intrathecal morphine via an intrathecal catheter after UDP in the treatment of obstetric PDPH.”

According to the ATLAS of Headache Disorders and Resources data, headaches, including migraine and tension-type headache, are among the most prevalent disorders in the world’s general population. Worldwide prevalence studies have estimated that one-half to three-quarters of adults aged 18 to 65 years have experienced at least one headache in the previous year. This data reports that over 10% of affected individuals have migraine, and 1.7-4% of the adult population is affected by headache on 15 or more days every month (WHO, 2011).

The International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) lists migraine as a primary headache. A primary headache is one that is not associated with any demonstrable organic disease, or structural or neurologic abnormality. Migraines may be unilateral or bilateral. They may occur with or without a preceding aura, such as dizziness, tinnitus, photophobia, or visual scintillations (for example, bright zigzag lines). Migraines manifest as a recurring attack usually lasting for 4-72 hours and involving pain of moderate to severe intensity, often with nausea, sometimes vomiting, sensitivity to light and/or sound and other sensory stimuli. Migraines are present in about 28 million people in the United States.

GONB or nerve block therapy has been proposed as a treatment of medically intractable chronic headache types, including migraine, cluster, cervicogenic and occipital neuralgia, using locally injected anesthetics with or without the addition of corticosteroid preparations.

Afferent: A nerve that carries impulses toward the central nervous system (CNS). The opposite of an afferent nerve is an efferent nerve that carries impulses away from the CNS.

Aura: Symptoms, such as disturbances in vision, smell or perception, that occur prior to a migraine headache and that often indicate the impending occurrence of a migraine headache.

Cervicogenic Headache: Pain referred to the head from the upper cervical vertebrae and muscles, which manifests as chronic hemicranial pain usually beginning in the suboccipital region and spreading anteriorly to the ipsilateral orbital, frontal, and temporal areas. This headache, of almost daily occurrence, is typically dominant on one side, but may occasionally be bilateral.

Cluster Headache: Sudden, intensely painful headaches that occur repeatedly in groups or clusters.

Ganglion: A group of neuron cell bodies in the peripheral nervous system. Ganglia provide relay points and intermediary connections between different neurological structures in the body, such as the peripheral and central nervous systems.

Intractable: Having no relief, such as a symptom or a disease that is not relieved by therapeutic measures.

Migraine: A vascular headache believed to be caused by blood flow changes and certain chemical changes in the brain leading to a cascade of events that include constriction of the arteries supplying blood to the brain with resultant severe headache, stomach upset, and visual disturbances, (referred to as aura). Sensitivity to light is also commonly associated with these headaches.  

Nociceptive: The ability of specific portions of the nervous system to sense and transmit painful stimuli.

Nummular Headache: A rare headache disorder characterized by focal and well-circumscribed pain fixed within a rounded or oval/elliptical-shaped area of the head, typically 2 to 6 cm in diameter, which most commonly affects the parietal region and is almost always unilateral and side-locked. The pain is typically characterized as pressure-like, sharp, or stabbing and is usually mild to moderate in intensity. This disorder may be episodic or chronic with distortions of sensation including hyperesthesia, hypoesthesia, allodynia, and paresthesias frequently reported in the affected area.

Occipital Nerves: Spinal nerves; the greater occipital nerve arises from between the first and second cervical vertebrae, along with the lesser occipital nerve.

Occipital Neuralgia: This distinct type of headache is caused by irritation or injury to the greater or lesser occipital nerves. Occipital neuralgia is characterized by piercing, throbbing, or electric shock-like chronic pain in the upper neck, back of the head, and behind the ears, usually on one side of the head. Some individuals also experience pain in the scalp, forehead, and behind the eyes.

Sphenopalatine ganglion: a small structure of nerve cells located behind the bony structures of the nose. This bundle of nerves is associated with the trigeminal nerve which is involved in headache disorders.

The following codes for treatments and procedures applicable to this document are included below for informational purposes. Inclusion or exclusion of a procedure, diagnosis or device code(s) does not constitute or imply member coverage or provider reimbursement policy. Please refer to the member's contract benefits in effect at the time of service to determine coverage or non-coverage of these services as it applies to an individual member.

When services are Investigational and Not Medically Necessary:
When the code describes a procedure indicated in the Position Statement section as investigational and not medically necessary.

Peer Reviewed Publications:

1. Afridi SK, Shields KG, Bhola R, Goadsby PJ. Greater occipital nerve injection in primary headache syndromes--prolonged effects from a single injection. Pain. 2006; 122(1-2):126-129.
2. Allen SM, Mookadam F, Cha SS, et al. Greater occipital nerve block for acute treatment of migraine headache: A large retrospective cohort study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018; 31(2):211-218.
3. Ambrosini A, Schoenen J. Invasive pericranial nerve interventions. Cephalalgia. 2016; 36(12):1156-1169.
4. Ambrosini A, Vandenheede M, Rossi P, et al. Suboccipital injection with a mixture of rapid- and long-acting steroids in cluster headache: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Pain. 2005; 118(1-2):92-96.
5. Ashkenazi A, Blumenfeld A, Napchan U, et al. Peripheral nerve blocks and trigger point injections in headache management - a systematic review and suggestions for future research. Headache. 2010; 50(6):943-952.
6. Ashkenazi A, Matro R, Shaw JW, et al. Greater occipital nerve block using local anesthetics alone or with triamcinolone for transformed migraine: a randomized comparative study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych. 2008; 79(4):415-417.
7. Ashkenazi A, Young WB. The effects of greater occipital nerve block and trigger point injection on brush allodynia and pain in migraine. Headache. 2005; 45(4):350-354.
8. Biondi DM. Cervicogenic headache: a review of diagnostic and treatment strategies. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005; 105(4 Suppl 2):16S-22S.
9. Bogduk N, Govind A. Cervicogenic headache: an assessment of the evidence on clinical diagnosis, invasive tests, and treatment. Lancet Neur. 2009; 8(10):959-968.
10. Cady RK, Saper J, Dexter K, et al. Long-term efficacy of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study for repetitive sphenopalatine blockade with bupivacaine vs. saline with the Tx360 device for treatment of chronic migraine. Headache. 2015b; 55(4):529-542. 
11. Cady R, Saper J, Dexter K, Manley HR. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of repetitive transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion blockade with Tx360^® as acute treatment for chronic migraine. Headache. 2015a; 55(1):101-116.
12. Caponnetto V, Ornello R, Frattale I, et al. Efficacy and safety of greater occipital nerve block for the treatment of cervicogenic headache: a systematic review. Expert Rev Neurother. 2021; 21(5):591-597.
13. Chavin JM. Cranial neuralgias and headaches associated with cranial vascular disorders. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2003; 36(6):1079-1093.
14. Chen YF, Bramley G, Unwin G, et al. Occipital nerve stimulation for chronic migraine—a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0116786.
15. Chowdhury D, Mundra A, Datta D, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of combination treatment of topiramate and greater occipital nerve block versus topiramate monotherapy for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine: A randomized controlled trial. Cephalalgia. 2022; 42(9):859-871.
16. Chowdhury D, Tomar A, Deorari V et al. Greater occipital nerve blockade for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2023; 43(2):3331024221143541.
17. Cuadradro ML, Aledo-Serrano A, Navarro P, et al. Short-term effects of greater occipital nerve blocks in chronic migraine: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Cephalagia. 2017; 37(9):864-872.
18. Dach F, Éckeli ÁL, Ferreira KS, Speciali JG. Nerve block for the treatment of headaches and cranial neuralgias, a practical approach. Headache. 2015; 55(Suppl 1):59-71.
19. Dilli E, Halker R, Vargas B, et al. Occipital nerve block for the short-term preventive treatment of migraine: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2015; 35(11):959-968.
20. Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Reed KL, et al. Safety and efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation of the occipital nerves for the management of chronic migraine: long-term results from a randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2015; 35(4):344-358.
21. Flamer D, Alakkad H, Soneji N, et al. Comparison of two ultrasound-guided techniques for greater occipital nerve injections in chronic migraine: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019; 44(5):595-603.
22. Friedman BW, Irizarry E, Williams A, et al. A randomized, double-dummy, emergency department-based study of greater occipital nerve block with bupivacaine vs intravenous metoclopramide for treatment of migraine. Headache. 2020; 60(10):2380-2388.
23. Gantenbein AR, Lutz NJ, Riederer F, Sándor PS. Efficacy and safety of 121 injections of the greater occipital nerve in episodic and chronic cluster headache. Cephalalgia. 2012; 32(8):630-634.
24. Gaul C, Roguski J, Dresler T, et al. Efficacy and safety of a single occipital nerve blockade in episodic and chronic cluster headache: a prospective observational study. Cephalagia. 2017; 37(9):873-880.
25. Govindappagari S, Grossman TB, Dayal AK, et al. Peripheral nerve blocks in the treatment of migraine in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124(6):1169-1174.
26. Gul HL, Ozon AO, Karadas O, et al. The efficacy of greater occipital nerve blockade in chronic migraine: a placebo-controlled study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017; 136(2):138-144.
27. Hammond SR, Danta G. Occipital neuralgia. Clin Exp Neurol. 1978; 15:258-270.
28. Inan LE, Inan N, Karadaş Ö, et al. Greater occipital nerve blockade for the treatment of chronic migraine: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2015; 132(4):270-277.
29. Jasper JF, Hayek SM. Implanted occipital nerve stimulators. Pain Physician. 2008; 11(2):187-220.
30. Jespersen MS, Jaeger P, Ægidius KL,et al. Sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of postdural puncture headache: a randomised, blinded, clinical trial. Br J Anaesth. 2020; 124(6):739-747.
31. Kashipazha D, Nakhostin-Mortazavi A, Mohammadianinejad SE, et al. Preventive effect of greater occipital nerve block on severity and frequency of migraine headache. Glob J Health Sci. 2014; 6(6):209-213.
32. Korucu O, Dagar S, Çorbacioglu ŞK, et al. The effectiveness of greater occipital nerve blockade in treating acute migraine-related headaches in emergency departments. Acta Neurol Scand. 2018; 138(3):212-218.
33. Lambru G, Abu Bakar N, Stahlhut L, et al. Greater occipital nerve blocks in chronic cluster headache: a prospective open-label study. Eur J Neurol. 2014; 21(2):338-343.
34. Levin M. Nerve blocks in the treatment of headache. Neurotherapeutics. 2010; 7(2):197-203.
35. Mekhail NA, Estemalik E, Azer G, et al. Safety and efficacy of occipital nerves stimulation for the treatment of chronic migraines: Randomized, double-blind, controlled single-center experience. Pain Pract. 2017; 17(5):669-677.
36. Miller S, Watkins L, Matharu M. Long-term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation for chronic migraine: a cohort of 53 patients. J Headache Pain. 2016; 17(1):68.
37. Naja ZM, El-Rajob M, Al-Tannir MA, et al. Occipital nerve blockade for cervicogenic headache: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. Pain Pract. 2006; 6(2):89-95.
38. Palamar D, Uluduz D, Saip S, et al. Ultrasound-guided greater occipital nerve block: an efficient technique in chronic refractory migraine without aura. Pain Physician. 2015; 18(2):153-162.
39. Peres MF, Stiles MA, Siow HC, et al. Greater occipital nerve blockade for cluster headache. Cephalalgia. 2002; 22(7):520-522.
40. Pingree MJ, Sole JS, OʼBrien TG, et al. Clinical efficacy of an ultrasound-guided greater occipital nerve block at the level of C2. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017; 42(1):99-104.
41. Rodrigo D, Acin P, Bermejo P. Occipital nerve stimulation for refractory chronic migraine: Results of a long-term prospective study. Pain Physician. 2017; 20(1):E151-E159.
42. Santos LS, Cuadrado Pérez ML, Guerrero Peral AL, et al. Consensus recommendations for anesthetic peripheral nerve block. Neurologia. 2017; 32(5):316-330.
43. Shauly O, Gould DJ, Sahai-Srivastava S, et al. Greater occipital nerve block for the treatment of chronic migraine headaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144(4):943-952.
44. Tang Y, Kang J, Zhang Y, Zhang X. Influence of greater occipital nerve block on pain severity in migraine patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2017; 35(11):1750-1754.
45. Vanelderen P, Lataster A, Levy R, et al. Occipital neuralgia: Evidence-based medicine. Pain Prac. 2010; 10(2):137-144.
46. Velásquez-Rimachi V, Chachaima-Mar J, Cárdenas-Baltazar EC et al. Greater occipital nerve block for chronic migraine patients: A meta-analysis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2022; 146(2):101-114.
47. Voigt CL, Murphy MO. Occipital nerve blocks in the treatment of headaches: safety and efficacy. Clinical Review. J Emerg Med. 2015; 48(1):115-129.
48. Weibelt S, Andress-Rothrock D, King W, Rothrock J. Suboccipital nerve blocks for suppression of chronic migraine: safety, efficacy, and predictors of outcome. Headache. 2010; 50(6):1041-1044.
49. Yang Y, Song M, Fan Y, Ma K. Occipital nerve stimulation for migraine: A systematic review. Pain Pract. 2016; 16(4):509-517.
50. Zhang H, Yang X, Lin Y, et al. The efficacy of greater occipital nerve block for the treatment of migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018; 165:129-133.

Government Agency, Medical Society, and Other Authoritative Publications:

1. American Academy of Neurological Surgeons (AANS). Occipital Neuralgia. 2024. Available at:  Occipital Neuralgia – Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis and Treatment (aans.org). Accessed on June 10, 2024.
2. Ailani J, Burch RC, Robbins MS. American Headache Society (AHS). The American Headache Society position statement on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache. 2021; 61(7):1021-1039.
3. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Statement on post-dural puncture headache management. October 2021. For additional information visit the ASA website: https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-practice-parameters/statement-on-post-dural-puncture-headache-management. Accessed on June 10, 2024.
4. Barad M, Ailani J, Hakim S, et al. Percutaneous interventional strategies for migraine prevention: a systematic review and practice guideline. Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.). 2022; 23(1):164-188.
5. Blumenfeld A, Ashkenazi A, Evans RW. Occipital and trigeminal nerve blocks for migraine. Headache. 2015; 682-689.
6. Blumenfeld A, Ashkenazi A, Grosberg B, et al. Patterns of use of peripheral nerve blocks and trigger point injections among headache practitioners in the USA: results of the American Headache Society Interventional Procedure Survey (AHS-IPS). Headache. 2010; 50(6):937-942.
7. Blumenfeld A, Ashkenazi A, Napchan U, et al. American Headache Society Special Interest Section. Expert consensus recommendations for the performance of peripheral nerve blocks for headaches--a narrative review. Headache. 2013; 53(3):437-446.
8. British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH). Guidelines for All Healthcare Professionals in the Diagnosis and Management of Migraine, Tension-Type Headache, Cluster Headache, Medication Overuse Headache. 2010.  Available at: https://ihs-headache.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/1855_bash-management-guidelines-2010.pdf. Accessed on June 10, 2024.
9. International Headache Society. Headache Classification Subcommittee. The international classification of headache disorders. Third edition. Cephalalgia. 2018; 38(1):1-211. Available at: https://ichd-3.org/. Accessed on June 10, 2024.
10. May A, Evers S, Goadsby PJ et al. European Academy of Neurology Task Force. European Academy of Neurology guidelines on the treatment of cluster headache. Eur J Neurol. 2023 Oct; 30(10):2955-2979.
11. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Occipital neuralgia. Last reviewed January 20, 2023. Available at: https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/All-Disorders/Occipital-Neuralgia-Information-Page. Accessed on June 10, 2024.

Headache
Migraine
Occipital Nerve Block, Blockade (greater, lesser)
Occipital Neuralgia
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block, Blockade

The use of specific product names is illustrative only. It is not intended to be a recommendation of one product over another, and is not intended to represent a complete listing of all products available.

Applicable to Commercial HMO members in California: When a medical policy states a procedure or treatment is investigational, PMGs should not approve or deny the request. Instead, please fax the request to Anthem Blue Cross Grievance and Appeals at fax # 818-234-2767 or 818-234-3824. For questions, call G&A at 1-800-365-0609 and ask to speak with the Investigational Review Nurse.

Federal and State law, as well as contract language, including definitions and specific contract provisions/exclusions, take precedence over Medical Policy and must be considered first in determining eligibility for coverage. The member’s contract benefits in effect on the date that services are rendered must be used. Medical Policy, which addresses medical efficacy, should be considered before utilizing medical opinion in adjudication. Medical technology is constantly evolving, and we reserve the right to review and update Medical Policy periodically.

No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without permission from the health plan.

© CPT Only – American Medical Association